From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breckenridge Company, Limited v. Perkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1897
15 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

March Term, 1897.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Barrett, Rumsey, O'Brien and Ingraham, JJ.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. —


The judgment entered upon the report of the referee in this action finally disposed of all the rights of the parties; and it was clearly a final judgment. ( Gates v. Canfield, 2 Civ. Proc. Rep. 254.) It is quite true that the judgment as entered was defective in that it did not contain a recital which it should have contained. But this court has held that this judgment should not be set aside for that reason. It is, therefore, a valid and existing judgment, and the execution issued pursuant to it was properly issued and should not be set aside. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Breckenridge Company, Limited v. Perkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1897
15 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Breckenridge Company, Limited v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:The Breckenridge Company, Limited, Respondent, v. James D. Perkins and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1897

Citations

15 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)