From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breakman v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 7, 2012
3:10-cv-00633-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 7, 2012)

Opinion

3:10-cv-00633-LRH-VPC

11-07-2012

ANTONIO M. BREAKMAN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#67) entered on September 14, 2012, recommending granting Defendant's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (#52) filed on March 8, 2012. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#67) entered on September 14, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#67) entered on September 14, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (#52) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Breakman v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 7, 2012
3:10-cv-00633-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Breakman v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO M. BREAKMAN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

3:10-cv-00633-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 7, 2012)