From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breakfield v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Feb 11, 2003
97 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 80613

February 11, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis City; Philip D. Heagney, Judge.

Raymund Jared Capelovitch, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Stephanie Morrell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Booker T. Shaw, J.



ORDER


Appellant Nicholas Breakfield appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue in the alternative that the motion court consider the lesser-included offense of first degree trespass.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Breakfield v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Feb 11, 2003
97 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Breakfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS BREAKFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Feb 11, 2003

Citations

97 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)