From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brazil v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 28, 2012
NO. 09-12-00269-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 09-12-00269-CR

11-28-2012

ANDREW EUGENE BRAZIL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-11966


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Andrew Eugene Brazil pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to burglary of a habitation. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed him on unadjudicated community supervision for seven years. After the State filed a motion to revoke, the trial court found Brazil violated terms of the community supervision, adjudicated his guilt, and sentenced him to twenty years of confinement.

Brazil's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response from the appellant. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with counsel's conclusion. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial court's judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

____________________

DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice
Do Not Publish Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Brazil v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 28, 2012
NO. 09-12-00269-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Brazil v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW EUGENE BRAZIL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

NO. 09-12-00269-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 28, 2012)