From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brazier v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 30, 2015
NO. ED CV 14-1320-AG (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2015)

Opinion

NO. ED CV 14-1320-AG (AGR)

09-30-2015

KEVIN DEON BRAZIER, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: September 30, 2015

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brazier v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 30, 2015
NO. ED CV 14-1320-AG (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Brazier v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN DEON BRAZIER, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 30, 2015

Citations

NO. ED CV 14-1320-AG (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2015)