From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brazeal v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Nov 1, 2005
No. 07-05-0222-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2005)

Opinion

No. 07-05-0222-CR

November 1, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the 47th District Court of Randall County, No. 16,715-a, Hon. Hal Miner, Presiding.

Panel C: Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


Appellant, Randy Brazeal, appeals his theft conviction. However, the record does not contain a certification of his right to appeal as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). By letter dated September 9, 2005, this court notified the trial court, the district clerk, the district attorney and appellant's attorney of this omission and the need for the certification. More than 45 days have lapsed since all were notified of these circumstances, and the certification has yet to be filed. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) (requiring that the appeal be dismissed if a certification that shows that the defendant has a right to appeal has not been made part of the record). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Brazeal v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
Nov 1, 2005
No. 07-05-0222-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2005)
Case details for

Brazeal v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDY BRAZEAL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo

Date published: Nov 1, 2005

Citations

No. 07-05-0222-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2005)