From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brazan v. Brazan

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 28, 1995
653 So. 2d 581 (La. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-OC-0593

April 28, 1995

IN RE: Brazan, Deborah; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA94 1797; Parish of East Baton Rouge Family Court of East Baton Rouge Div. "A" Number 104,730


Granted; appeal dismissed. A subsequent substantive amendment to a final judgment made with the consent of both parties and signed prior to the lapse of the delay provided for taking an appeal may be considered to have the effect of creating a new final judgment from which the delay period for taking an appeal commences to run anew. Villaume v. Villaume, 363 So.2d 448 (La. 1978). In this case, however, the Second Amended Judgment, which was entered with the consent of both parties but did not make any substantive changes, was not signed until after the appeal delays had run for first Amended Judgment. JCW

WFM

JLD

CDK

BJJ

JPV

CALOGERO, C.J. would grant and docket.

LEMMON, J. not on panel.


Summaries of

Brazan v. Brazan

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 28, 1995
653 So. 2d 581 (La. 1995)
Case details for

Brazan v. Brazan

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH BRAZAN vs. RICHARD JOSEPH BRAZAN

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

653 So. 2d 581 (La. 1995)

Citing Cases

Wolfe v. Breaud

The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that a trial court's substantive amendment to a final judgment made with…

Glass v. Voiron

Id. The Louisiana Supreme Court explained in Brazan v. Brazan, 95-0593 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So.2d 581: A…