From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bray v. Rhythm Mgmt. Grp.

United States District Court, District of Maryland
Sep 24, 2024
Civil Action TDC-23-3142 (D. Md. Sep. 24, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action TDC-23-3142

09-24-2024

RHONDA BRAY, Plaintiff, v. RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP, PLLC, RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP CORP, and ALDRICH CAPITAL PARTNERS, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

THEODORE D. CHUANG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration, ECF No. 34, is DENIED.
2. Defendants' request that the Court strike certain allegations in the Amended Complaint, which the Court construes as a Motion to Strike, ECF No. 43, is DENIED.
3. Defendants are directed to file an Answer to the Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order.


Summaries of

Bray v. Rhythm Mgmt. Grp.

United States District Court, District of Maryland
Sep 24, 2024
Civil Action TDC-23-3142 (D. Md. Sep. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Bray v. Rhythm Mgmt. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:RHONDA BRAY, Plaintiff, v. RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, RHYTHM MANAGEMENT…

Court:United States District Court, District of Maryland

Date published: Sep 24, 2024

Citations

Civil Action TDC-23-3142 (D. Md. Sep. 24, 2024)