Opinion
2:23-00144-JAD-BNW
07-19-2023
Elaine Braxton, individually and as natural parent and guardian of D.N., a minor, Plaintiff, v. Clark County School District; a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada, Jesus F. Jara, in his individual and official capacity; Kody Barto, in his individual and official capacity; Gayle Orvedal, in her individual and official capacity; Michelle Brown, in her individual and official capacity; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. Matthew G. Pfau, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Elaine Braxton and D.N. Greenberg Traurig, LLP Kara Hendricks, Esq. Attorney for Defendants
Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. Matthew G. Pfau, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Elaine Braxton and D.N.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP Kara Hendricks, Esq. Attorney for Defendants
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT TO PLAINTIFFS ‘MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
(1ST REQUEST)
BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Plaintiff to file their Reply in Support to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF 37) be extended until August 7, 2023. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support is currently due on July 20, 2023. Plaintiffs are requesting an extension to accommodate Plaintiffs' counsel's schedule, which does not provide a meaningful opportunity to prepare a response until August 7, 2023. This request is being made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED