From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braxton v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 4, 2006
Case No.: 3:05cv126/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2006)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:05cv126/MCR/MD.

April 4, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 6, 2006. The petitioner previously has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 4) is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Braxton v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 4, 2006
Case No.: 3:05cv126/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2006)
Case details for

Braxton v. Bauknecht

Case Details

Full title:SAVINO BRAXTON, Petitioner, v. DONALD F. BAUKNECHT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

Case No.: 3:05cv126/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2006)