From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brawley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 15, 2002
815 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D00-2420.

May 15, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; James I. Cohn, Judge.

Raag Singhal of Law Offices of Kaplan Singhal, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Meredith L. Balo, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


We affirm on all issues raised. As to the specific issues concerning the factual basis for appellant's plea and the constitutionality of section 775.051, Florida Statutes, appellant failed to preserve these issues for review on direct appeal. See generally Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2); §§ 924.051(4), .06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 337, 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Appellant did not reserve the right to appeal any prior dispositive trial court orders when entering his no contest plea, nor did he subsequently move to withdraw his plea.

Affirmed.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brawley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 15, 2002
815 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Brawley v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER BRAWLEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 15, 2002

Citations

815 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Hawkins v. State

Similarly, Mr. Hawkins' entry of the no contest pleas constituted his acceptance that the underlying facts…

Binder v. State

In any event, since Binder did not object, reserve the right to appeal or move to withdraw his plea, he may…