From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bravot v. Internal Revenue Serv.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 21, 2021
1:21-cv-00681-BAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00681-BAM

09-21-2021

CHRISTOPHER EDWARD BRAVOT, SR., Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM FILING FEE

(Doc. 10)

Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Christopher Edward Bravot, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in the instant action against the Internal Revenue Service. (Doc. 1.)

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to dismiss this action without prejudice and for relief from the filing fee in this action filed on September 17, 2021. (Doc. 10.)

The Court construes the motion to dismiss as a request for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), “a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quotation and citation omitted). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can't complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Id. at 1078. No. defendant has been served in this action and no defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment.

Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and CLOSE THIS CASE.

Insofar as Plaintiff seeks relief from the filing fee in this action, his request will be denied. Earlier in this case, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 9.) It was explained to Plaintiff that he was obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action, in monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to his trust account. (Id. at 1.) The Director of the California Department of Corrections or his designee was ordered to send to the Clerk of the court payments from Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee is paid in full. (Id. (citing 28 U.S. § 1915(b)(2))). The entire $350.00 filing fee is statutorily required, and must be collected from Plaintiff's institutional account regardless of the outcome of this action and even if Plaintiff elects to dismiss this action. See, e.g., Myers v. Pulido, No. 1:16-cv-00638-SAB-PC, 2016 WL 6723937, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2016). As a result, Plaintiff's motion to be relieved of the obligation to pay this fee is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bravot v. Internal Revenue Serv.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 21, 2021
1:21-cv-00681-BAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Bravot v. Internal Revenue Serv.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER EDWARD BRAVOT, SR., Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 21, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00681-BAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)