Opinion
December 9, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.).
Order, as amended, affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A review of the allegations in the second and fourth causes of action indicates that the claimed damages flow from the alleged breach of the contract between the plaintiffs and the corporate defendant, and not from any alleged fraudulent misrepresentations on the part of defendant Leonard Widman. Accordingly, dismissal of those causes of action as against defendant Widman was proper. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.