From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braunstein v. Wolfson

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 9, 2018
No. 75038 (Nev. App. Oct. 9, 2018)

Opinion

No. 75038

10-09-2018

STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STEVEN B. WOLFSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY; AND THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondents.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original petition for a "Writ of Mandamus to Quash Criminal Information, and Criminal Judgment NRCIVP 8(a) Contract Violation of Statute." Steven Samuel Braunstein alleges the amended information filed on June 14, 2000, was incorrect, and the district court erred by amending the judgment of conviction on August 23, 2005, because neither he nor counsel were present when the judgment of conviction was amended. Braunstein seeks an order directing the district court to correct these errors.

We have considered the petition, and we are not satisfied this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Steven Samuel Braunstein

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Braunstein v. Wolfson

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 9, 2018
No. 75038 (Nev. App. Oct. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Braunstein v. Wolfson

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STEVEN B. WOLFSON, DISTRICT…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 9, 2018

Citations

No. 75038 (Nev. App. Oct. 9, 2018)