Opinion
No. 74996
10-09-2018
STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
In this "Amended Motion for Recall of Mandate based on Fraud, and Loss of Jurisdiction, (and) writ of Mandamus to Quash August 12, 2010, Judgment" Steven Samuel Braunstein challenges the judgment of conviction and alleges his counsel was ineffective. We have considered the petition, and we are not satisfied this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Silver /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Steven Samuel Braunstein
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk