From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 13, 2014
No. 65059 (Nev. May. 13, 2014)

Opinion

No. 65059

05-13-2014

STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE KATHY A. HARDCASTLE, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION AND REFERRING


PETITIONER FOR FORFEITURE OF CREDITS


PURSUANT TO NRS 209.451

This is a proper person petition for an injunction against judgment or arrest of judgment. Petitioner challenges his judgment of conviction. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1).

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

Petitioner has raised the same underlying issues in numerous other filings in this court. We previously cautioned petitioner that repeatedly raising the same issue constitutes frivolous action and that he could forfeit all deductions of time he has earned if he files frivolous documents in a civil action. See NRS 209.451. A petition for an injunction against judgment is a civil action. We have already informed petitioner that his continuous stream of filings is an abuse of judicial resources, and we conclude that the inclusion of the repetitive and unwarranted claims in the instant petition constitutes an improper purpose. Therefore, we refer this matter to the Director of the Department of Corrections to determine what forfeiture, if any, is warranted. See NRS 209.451(3). Accordingly, we

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. 64136 (Order Denying Petition and Referring Petitioner for Forfeiture of Credits Pursuant to NRS 209.451, November 14, 2013); Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket Nos. 63270 & 63411 (Order Denying Petitions, July 24, 2013); Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. 62546 (Order Denying Petition, March 8, 2013); Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. 57751 (Order Denying Petition, April 4, 2011); Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. 54122 (Order Denying Petition, August 24, 2009); Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. 53127 (Order Denying Petition, February 4, 2009).

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist Court, Docket Nos. 63270 & 63411 (Order Denying Petitions, July 24, 2013); sec also Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. 64136 (Order Denying Petition and Referring Petitioner for Forfeiture of Credits Pursuant to NRS 209.451, November 14, 2013).

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. 64136 (Order Denying Petition and Referring Petitioner for Forfeiture of Credits Pursuant to NRS 209.451, November 14, 2013).
--------

ORDER the petition DENIED and REFER this matter to the Director of the Department of Corrections.

__________, C.J.

Gibbons

__________, J.

Hardesty

__________, J.

Douglas
cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court

Hon. Kathy A. Hardcastle, Senior Judge

Steven Samuel Braunstein

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

Director, Department of Corrections


Summaries of

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 13, 2014
No. 65059 (Nev. May. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Braunstein v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 13, 2014

Citations

No. 65059 (Nev. May. 13, 2014)