Opinion
July 6, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fierro, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Trial Term properly determined that the separation agreement between the parties represents the full intent and obligation of the parties, and, absent any language imposing an obligation upon the defendant wife for the reimbursement to the plaintiff for his capital expenditures for repairs and improvements to the premises, the court should not find that such a provision is implied (see, Ives v. Ives, 96 A.D.2d 643; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 82 A.D.2d 849). Brown, J.P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.