From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braun v. U.S. Post Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Jun 27, 2016
CV 16-24-BU-BMM-JCL (D. Mont. Jun. 27, 2016)

Opinion

CV 16-24-BU-BMM-JCL

06-27-2016

DAVID STEVEN BRAUN Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff David Braun filed a Complaint (Doc. 2) and a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1). Braun included the necessary affidavit of financial resources in support of the Motion (Doc. 5). United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah Lynch entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on June 15, 2016. (Doc. 12 at 3.) Judge Lynch recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Id.

This Court will review Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

The Court possesses discretion to grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). The court should grant the statutory benefit only in cases in of exceptional circumstances. Weller v. Dickson, 314 F.2d 598, 600 (9th Cir. 1963). The court can grant the request if the applicant demonstrates sufficiently an inability to pay the court costs and to provide himself and his dependents the "necessities of life." Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948).

Braun's case presents no exceptional circumstances. Paying the court costs would not deprive Braun of the necessities of life. Braun discloses a monthly income of $3,527 in his financial Affidavit. Braun's monthly expenses are just more than one-third of his monthly income, totaling $1,333. Braun also lists significant financial assets. Braun possesses a bank account with a balance of $9,000. Braun owns a home that he values at $200,000 in Big Sky, Montana. Braun owns an Infiniti automobile.

Braun's income, his assets, and lack of dependents indicate that paying the court costs would deprive Braun of the necessities of life. Additionally, the Magistrate Judge noted that the claim in this case mimics a prior lawsuit, Braun v. USPS, CV 14-72-BUCV- DWM-JCL, which this court dismissed without leave to amend. (Doc. 12 at 2.) Based on these findings, the Magistrate Judge did not commit clear error in denying the application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court adopts Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Braun's request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter, by separate document, a judgment of dismissal.

DATED this 27th day of June, 2016.

/s/_________

Brian Morris

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Braun v. U.S. Post Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Jun 27, 2016
CV 16-24-BU-BMM-JCL (D. Mont. Jun. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Braun v. U.S. Post Office

Case Details

Full title:DAVID STEVEN BRAUN Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 27, 2016

Citations

CV 16-24-BU-BMM-JCL (D. Mont. Jun. 27, 2016)