From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bratton v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Dec 21, 2009
1:09CV323, 1:08CR43-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2009)

Opinion

1:09CV323, 1:08CR43-1.

December 21, 2009


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on October 20, 2009, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence [Doc. 17] is DENIED and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action is entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.


Summaries of

Bratton v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Dec 21, 2009
1:09CV323, 1:08CR43-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Bratton v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE BERNARD BRATTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Dec 21, 2009

Citations

1:09CV323, 1:08CR43-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2009)