Bratton v. Hedgpeth

Full title: RONALD BRATTON, Plaintiff, v. A. HEDGPETH, Warden, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

CIV S-11-0781 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

RONALD BRATTON, Plaintiff, v. A. HEDGPETH, Warden, et al., Defendants. No. CIV S-11-0781 MCE GGH P. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 30, 2012.

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.

         On September 16, 2011, plaintiff filed an "objection, " which the Court will construe as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's orders filed on August 18, 2011 (ECF Nos. 11, 12), screening plaintiff's amended complaint and assessing a filing fee. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

         Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Objections (request for reconsideration) is DENIED.