From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bratton v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2012
No. CIV S-11-0781 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0781 MCE GGH P

01-27-2012

RONALD BRATTON, Plaintiff, v. A. HEDGPETH, Warden, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On September 16, 2011, plaintiff filed an "objection," which the Court will construe as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's orders filed on August 18, 2011 (ECF Nos. 11, 12), screening plaintiff's amended complaint and assessing a filing fee. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Objections (request for reconsideration) is DENIED.

_________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bratton v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2012
No. CIV S-11-0781 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Bratton v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:RONALD BRATTON, Plaintiff, v. A. HEDGPETH, Warden, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0781 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)