From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bratton v. Cnty. of Riverside

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 8, 2019
Case No. EDCV 18-44-JVS (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 18-44-JVS (GJS)

02-08-2019

HERMAN JAMES BRATTON, Plaintiff v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all pleadings and documents filed and lodged in this action, the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint brought by certain Defendants (Dkt. 47, "Motion"), and the related Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 50, "Report"). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed, and no objections have been filed with the Court.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) Defendants A. Gayda, J. Rodriguez, R. Garcia, and A. Hadraki are dismissed without leave to amend; (3) Defendants A. Sanchez, P. Sanchez, and Chief Deputy Warden are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Magistrate Judge is directed to issue any appropriate orders with respect to further proceedings in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: February 08, 2019

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bratton v. Cnty. of Riverside

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 8, 2019
Case No. EDCV 18-44-JVS (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Bratton v. Cnty. of Riverside

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN JAMES BRATTON, Plaintiff v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 8, 2019

Citations

Case No. EDCV 18-44-JVS (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2019)

Citing Cases

McDantel v. Diaz

Defendants provide the Court with only one case in support of this proposition. (Id., citing Bratton v. Cty.…

Austin v. Sherman

"To state a viable Eighth Amendment-based Section 1983 claim based on overdetention, a plaintiff must show…