From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braten Apparel Corp. v. Rutger Fabrics Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 3, 1970
35 A.D.2d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

December 3, 1970


Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 17, 1970, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion for a stay of arbitration denied. Appellant shall recover of petitioner-respondent $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Though the contracts for the sale of goods were not signed by the purchaser, petitioner herein, it is undisputed that it gave instructions in regard to assortments under the contract numbers and accepted and paid for a substantial portion of the goods delivered pursuant to the contracts. This is sufficient, with the added circumstance that these contracts were in the same form as those previously used in a long period of dealings between the parties, to establish petitioner's acceptance. It follows that the arbitration clause in the contracts is effective ( Matter of Helen Whiting, Inc. [ Trojan Textile Corp.], 307 N.Y. 360; Matter of Baroque Fashions [ Scotney Mills], 19 A.D.2d 873).

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Nunez, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Braten Apparel Corp. v. Rutger Fabrics Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 3, 1970
35 A.D.2d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Braten Apparel Corp. v. Rutger Fabrics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BRATEN APPAREL CORP., Respondent, v. RUTGER FABRICS CORP., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1970

Citations

35 A.D.2d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Tanbro Fabrics v. Deering Milliken

In my view there is an impress of arbitration in the dealings between these parties. ( Matter of Blum Folding…

John Thallon Co., v. M N Meat Company

Fisser v. International Bank, 282 F.2d 231, 233 (2d Cir. 1960); Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. v. Docutel Corp.,…