In several enumerations of error, McCannon claims the trial court erred by using in its charge to the jury the suggested pattern charges on "Negligence — Equal Negligence — No Recovery," "Negligence — Comparative Negligence," "Negligence — Avoidance of Consequences," and "Negligence — Assumption of Risk," as well as a nonpattern charge on the "Duty of Guest Passenger with Respect to Negligence of Driver." According to McCannon, these charges were not properly adjusted to the facts of the case and unwarranted based on our opinion in Braswell v. Clayton, 238 Ga. App. 302, 303-304 (2) ( 518 SE2d 714) (1999). However, McCannon relies on his own favorable testimony that he did not know Wilson was speeding, that he did not encourage any speeding, and that Wilson was not drunk to support this argument.