From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braswell v. Chowdhury

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
May 14, 2008
CASE NO. 4:08CV204-WS/AK (N.D. Fla. May. 14, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:08CV204-WS/AK.

May 14, 2008


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint against two doctors at the Hillsborough County Jail in Tampa, Florida, alleging that they lied about his mental condition. (Doc. 1). He has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which is incomplete. (Doc. 2). Because Hillsborough County is located in the Middle District of Florida, as are the Defendants, the proper forum for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 89(b) is in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division.

A federal district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to transfer a case to another district or division "in which it could have been brought." A court may raise the issue of defective venue sua sponte, but should not dismiss an improperly filed case for lack of venue without giving the parties an opportunity to respond. Lipofsky v. New York State Workers Comp. Bd., 861 F.2d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 1988). The Lipofsky court did not place the same limitations on the court's ability to transfer a case to the appropriate forum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). See Lipofsky, 861 F.2d at 1259, n. 2. Thus, it is recommended that the case be transferred rather than dismissed. There is no need for a hearing on this transfer. Cf. Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986) with Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 934 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

In light of the foregoing, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, for all further proceedings.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.


Summaries of

Braswell v. Chowdhury

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
May 14, 2008
CASE NO. 4:08CV204-WS/AK (N.D. Fla. May. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Braswell v. Chowdhury

Case Details

Full title:STEWART BRASWELL, #119292 Plaintiff, v. DR. CHOWDHURY, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: May 14, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 4:08CV204-WS/AK (N.D. Fla. May. 14, 2008)