From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bransford-Wakefiled v. Wakefield

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 6, 2013
No. 32,400 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. 32,400

03-06-2013

DEBORAH BRANSFORD-WAKEFILED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOEL C. WAKEFIELD, Defendants-Appellant.

Beatrice Castellano Lockhart Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Joel C. Wakefield Santa Fe, NM Pro Se Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY
Sarah M. Singleton, District Judge
Beatrice Castellano Lockhart
Santa Fe, NM
for Appellee Joel C. Wakefield
Santa Fe, NM
Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

CYNTHIA A. FRY , Judge

WE CONCUR:

________________________
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
________________________
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge


Summaries of

Bransford-Wakefiled v. Wakefield

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 6, 2013
No. 32,400 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Bransford-Wakefiled v. Wakefield

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH BRANSFORD-WAKEFILED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOEL C. WAKEFIELD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

No. 32,400 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2013)