From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brannen v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 20, 1986
102 Nev. 7 (Nev. 1986)

Opinion

No. 16341

February 20, 1986

Appeal from the Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Grant L. Bowen, J.

Patrick J. Mullen and Will G. Crocket, Reno, for Appellant.

Brian McKay, Attorney General, Carson City; Mills Lane, District Attorney, Gary H. Hatlestad, Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.


OPINION


A criminal complaint, filed on March 8, 1984, charged that "during the summer months of 1980" John Brannen committed the crime of lewdness with a child under the age of fourteen. NRS 201.230. A magistrate conducted a preliminary hearing and ordered Brannen to stand trial. The state filed the information charging the offense on April 5, 1984.

After a jury trial Brannen was convicted of the crime charged and sentenced to five years in the Nevada State Prison. The trial judge suspended the sentence and placed Brannen on probation.

On appeal Brannen contends that his conviction must be reversed because the statute of limitations had run, and the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appellant, an issue which counsel did not raise at trial. We agree.

NRS 171.095(2) requires that prosecution for the offense of lewdness with a child under fourteen be brought within three years of commission of the crime. The state failed to file its complaint against Brannen within the statutory period mandated by the legislature.

This appeal is governed by NRS 171.085 as it appeared in 1984. It provided as follows:

2. An indictment for any other felony than murder, theft, robbery, burglary, forgery, arson or sexual assault must be found, or an information or complaint filed, within 3 years after the commission of the offense.

Brannen's prosecution under NRS 201.230 is therefore precluded by the statute of limitations. See Melvin v. Sheriff, 92 Nev. 146, 546 P.2d 1294 (1976); Cherubini v. Sheriff, 92 Nev. 111, 54 P.2d 598 (1976).

Respondent contends that the 1984 version of NRS 171.095 tolled the running of the statute of limitations; the state's arguments do not have merit and need not be discussed here.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Brannen v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 20, 1986
102 Nev. 7 (Nev. 1986)
Case details for

Brannen v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN A. BRANNEN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Feb 20, 1986

Citations

102 Nev. 7 (Nev. 1986)
714 P.2d 175

Citing Cases

Hubbard v. State

Appellant contends in his petition for rehearing that this statement is untrue and that our prior opinions…

Walstrom v. State

Unless the NRS 171.095 "in a secret manner" exception tolls the statute of limitations, the conviction must…