From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branks v. Anderson Auto. Grp.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Nov 18, 2022
1:22-cv-99-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-99-MOC-DCK

11-18-2022

SPARROW S. BRANKS, Plaintiff, v. ANDERSON AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

Max O. Cogburn Jr., United States District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant. (Doc. No. 8).

Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on August 11, 2022. (Doc. No. 13). Because Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint, the pending motion to dismiss the original Complaint is moot. See Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (“The general rule ... is that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.”); Turner v. Kight, 192 F.Supp.2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motions to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 8), is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Branks v. Anderson Auto. Grp.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Nov 18, 2022
1:22-cv-99-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Branks v. Anderson Auto. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:SPARROW S. BRANKS, Plaintiff, v. ANDERSON AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

Date published: Nov 18, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-99-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2022)