From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branic Int'l v. Pitt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 6, 2015
124 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

01-06-2015

In re BRANIC INTERNATIONAL, REALTY CORP., Petitioner–Respondent, v. Phillip PITT, etc., Respondent–Appellant, “John Doe,” et al., Respondents.

West Side SRO Law Project, New York (Martha Weithman of counsel), for appellant. Rosenberg Calica & Birney LLP, Garden City (Ronald J. Rosenberg of counsel), for respondent.


West Side SRO Law Project, New York (Martha Weithman of counsel), for appellant.

Rosenberg Calica & Birney LLP, Garden City (Ronald J. Rosenberg of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

On remittitur from the Court of Appeals (24 N.Y.3d 1005, 997 N.Y.S.2d 111, 21 N.E.3d 563 [2014] ), order, Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on or about December 22, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, reversed an order of the Civil Court, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered on or about June 9, 2009, granting respondent's motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition and denying petitioner's motion for summary judgment on its claim for possession, denied respondent's motion, and granted petitioner's motion, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the order of the Appellate Term vacated, and the proceeding dismissed as moot.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Branic Int'l v. Pitt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 6, 2015
124 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Branic Int'l v. Pitt

Case Details

Full title:In re BRANIC INTERNATIONAL, REALTY CORP., Petitioner–Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 6, 2015

Citations

124 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 227
997 N.Y.S.2d 625

Citing Cases

Dexter 345, Inc. v. Hanlon

On remittitur, the Appellate Division dismissed the proceeding as moot, but still vacated and unanimously…

Dexter 345, Inc. v. Hanlon

On remittitur, the Appellate Division dismissed the proceeding as moot, but still vacated and unanimously…