From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brandt v. Blumenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

January, 1931.


Order granting plaintiff's motion for a preference reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the motion papers fail to present facts sufficient to entitle respondent to a preference. Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., concurs in result, and is of opinion that the Special Term for motions in Kings county should not pass upon applications for the preference of cases on the Trial Term calendar in Nassau county.


Summaries of

Brandt v. Blumenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Brandt v. Blumenthal

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BRANDT, Respondent, v. ALFRED C. BLUMENTHAL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)