Opinion
Civil Action No. 6:11-CV-016-CECF
08-20-2012
DONNY S. BRANDSTETTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
ORDER
On March 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed his Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A United States Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on May 29, 2012, and Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on June 1, 2012. The Court has made a de novo review of the record and finds Plaintiff's objection to be without merit. The Court is also of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation correctly resolves the issues raised in Plaintiff's motion.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED by the Court, and Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED.
_______________
SAM R. CUMMINGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT/JUDGE