From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brandon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 4, 1996
671 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-775.

April 4, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. R. Hudson Olliff, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Terry Carley, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Earnest Raja Brandon (Brandon) challenges his judgment and sentence for robbery with a weapon. His appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After reviewing the record, we agree with his counsel that there are no meritorious issues for appeal except for two errors made during sentencing. Specifically, the trial court erred in imposing a probation condition, which requires Brandon to obtain employment within ninety days of his release from prison. While the trial court has the authority to require a probationer to make a good faith effort to seek gainful employment within a specified period of time as a special condition of probation, it cannot require a probationer absolutely to obtain employment by a certain date or to maintain certain employment, absent a showing of his or her ability to do so. Vezina v. State, 644 So.2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Evans v. State, 608 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In addition, the trial court erred in assessing $625 for the services of the public defender where it failed to consider this fee at the sentencing hearing, and failed to give Brandon notice of the amount of the fee imposed or notice of the right to a hearing to contest that amount. Kirby v. State, 658 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

Accordingly, we affirm Brandon's conviction and sentence but strike the attorney's fee imposed, and remand with directions to modify the probation condition consistent with this opinion. On remand, attorney's fees may be reimposed after Brandon is given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the amount of the fee.

AFFIRM in part; REVERSE and REMAND in part.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brandon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 4, 1996
671 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Brandon v. State

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST BRANDON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 4, 1996

Citations

671 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)