From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brandl v. Hower

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Sep 5, 2013
838 N.W.2d 865 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

Nos. 2012AP1703 2012AP2812.

2013-09-5

Donald L. BRANDL and Patricia J. Brandl, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Chris D. HOWER, Deborah J. Hower, Dale O. Pino, Randall D. Blask, Loris A. Blask, Paul Becker, Thomas M. Hawley and Kirin B. Hawley, Defendants–Respondents.

Further, Moe separately testified in regard to the easement that he expected that all the lot owners would be good neighbors, would “help out each other,” and would “[not] fight with each other.” This testimony could support more than one reasonable inference as to Moe's intent. We conclude, however, that one reasonable inference is the one that the circuit court drew, namely that Moe intended for all of the lot owners to use the entire length of the lake access road.



Summaries of

Brandl v. Hower

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Sep 5, 2013
838 N.W.2d 865 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Brandl v. Hower

Case Details

Full title:Donald L. BRANDL and Patricia J. Brandl, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Chris…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Sep 5, 2013

Citations

838 N.W.2d 865 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
351 Wis. 2d 224
2013 WI App. 128