Brand v. Warren

Full title: Robin BRAND, Appellant, v. Kevin WARREN, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Mar 13, 2018

543 S.W.3d 78 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 106017

03-13-2018

Robin BRAND, Appellant, v. Kevin WARREN, Respondent.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Jeremy Andrew Gogel, 4542 West Pine Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63108, THE GOGEL LAW FIRM. ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: H. Anthony Relys, J. Brent Dulle, Co-Counsel, 1200 Market Street, City Hall Room 314, St. Louis, MO 63103, CITY COUNSELOR’S OFFICE.

PER CURIAM.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Jeremy Andrew Gogel, 4542 West Pine Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63108, THE GOGEL LAW FIRM.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: H. Anthony Relys, J. Brent Dulle, Co-Counsel, 1200 Market Street, City Hall Room 314, St. Louis, MO 63103, CITY COUNSELOR’S OFFICE.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Robin Brand appeals from the trial court’s "Order and Judgment" granting Kevin Warren’s Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).