From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brand v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 25, 2022
No. 32233-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 25, 2022)

Opinion

32233-21

10-25-2022

DENNIS H. BRAND & BETTY B. BRAND, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On January 20, 2022, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the grounds that no notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) to form the basis for a petition to this Court, or notice of determination concerning collection action pursuant to section 6320 and/or 6330, I.R.C., had been sent to petitioners with respect to taxable years 2019 and 2020, nor had respondent made any other determination with respect to petitioners' tax years 2019 and 2020 that would confer jurisdiction on the Court, as of the date the petition herein was filed. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioners have failed to do so.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Brand v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 25, 2022
No. 32233-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Brand v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS H. BRAND & BETTY B. BRAND, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Oct 25, 2022

Citations

No. 32233-21 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 25, 2022)