From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 1991
177 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 18, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs; and it is further,

Ordered that the parties are directed to appear at this court on Wednesday, November 27, 1991, at 12:00 noon, to be heard upon the issue of the imposition of appropriate sanctions or costs pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, if any.

Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (9) (b), a party is entitled to a modification of a child support award if it can be demonstrated that there has been a substantial change in circumstances (see, Matter of Boden v. Boden, 42 N.Y.2d 210). A party seeking to modify the child support provisions of a judgment of divorce must demonstrate that continued enforcement of the party's support obligations would create an extreme hardship and it is incumbent upon the movant to demonstrate that there has been a change in financial circumstances which necessitates a reduction in the award of child support (see, Praeger v. Praeger, 162 A.D.2d 671; Sofia v. Sofia, 162 A.D.2d 594; Matter of Cohen v. Seletsky, 142 A.D.2d 111; Scagnelli v Scagnelli, 127 A.D.2d 754). As is readily apparent, the plaintiff failed to make such a showing. He attended the hearing without the financial documentation required, denied having books and records with respect to his law practice, and contumaciously refused to comply with the defendant's requests for financial disclosure. Thus, his application was properly denied.

The defendant requested the imposition of sanctions. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the plaintiff's conduct in pursuing yet another appeal, constituting his thirteenth to this court, so obviously lacks merit in either fact or law that it must be characterized as frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c). Accordingly, the parties are directed to appear at this court to be heard upon the issue of the imposition of appropriate sanctions or costs pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, if any. Kunzeman, J.P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 1991
177 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR BRANCOVEANU, Appellant, v. MARIANA BRANCOVEANU, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 322

Citing Cases

Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu

Ordered that Victor Brancoveanu, the plaintiff pro se, is directed to pay $1,500, in costs to Mariana…