From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branch v. United Parcel Serv.

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Feb 25, 2022
Civil Action 18-cv-03358-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 25, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 18-cv-03358-PAB-KLM

02-25-2022

LARRY BRANCH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix filed on February 7, 2022 [Docket No. 105]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. Docket No. 105 at 24; see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on February 7, 2022. No. party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

This standard of review is something less than a “clearly erroneous or contrary to law” standard of review, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix [Docket No. 105] is ACCEPTED;

2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof [Docket No. 77] is GRANTED; and

3. This case is closed.


Summaries of

Branch v. United Parcel Serv.

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Feb 25, 2022
Civil Action 18-cv-03358-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Branch v. United Parcel Serv.

Case Details

Full title:LARRY BRANCH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Colorado

Date published: Feb 25, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 18-cv-03358-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 25, 2022)