Branch v. Maxwell

1 Citing case

  1. Glisson v. Glisson

    454 S.E.2d 508 (Ga. 1995)   Cited 8 times

    In light of appellee's contention that he did not sign the deed, and that if he did, he was induced to do so by fraud, that verdict form and the accompanying instructions, which called for the jury to decide mixed questions of fact and law, were not adequately crafted to elicit a decision on the issues before the court. See Branch v. Maxwell, 203 Ga. App. 553 (5) (f) ( 417 S.E.2d 176) (1992); OCGA ยง 9-11-49 (a). Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Hunt, C. J., and Carley, J., who concur in the judgment only.