From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branch v. Branch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-06270.

October 20, 2009.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.), dated June 24, 2008, which denied her motion to vacate her default in failing to appear for trial and to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Thomas J. Lavallee, Hauppauge, N.Y., for appellant.

Judd Moss, P.C., Ronkonkoma, N.Y. (Francine H. Moss of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Dickerson, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the defendant's motion to vacate her default in failing to appear for trial and to restore the action to the trial calendar is granted.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion. The defendant was approximately one hour late in appearing for trial, there was no indication that her lateness was willful or inexcusable, and there was no indication that the plaintiff was prejudiced by the short delay ( see Jeffrey L. Rosenberg Assoc., LLC v Lajaunie, 35 AD3d 668; Jolkovsky v Legeman, 32 AD3d 418). Moreover, the courts generally have "a liberal policy with respect to vacating defaults in matrimonial actions" ( Passas v Passas, 18 AD3d 842).


Summaries of

Branch v. Branch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Branch v. Branch

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BRANCH, Respondent, v. LISA BRANCH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7570
886 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

Ito v. Ito

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, the…