From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branch v. Annucci

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 17, 2022
20-CV-07968 (ER)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 17, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-07968 (ER)(SN)

06-17-2022

WALTER BRANCH, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SARAH NETBURN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On February 28, 2022, Judge Ramos denied Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint but permitted Defendants to submit an additional brief responding to the complaint as a contempt motion. ECF No. 34. Defendants filed their opposition on May 11, 2022, and Plaintiff's reply was due on June 1, 2022. As of the issuance of this order, Plaintiff has filed no reply.

On its own motion, the Court grants the pro se Plaintiff a final extension of two weeks to reply to Defendants' opposition. His reply is due by July 1, 2022. No further extensions will be granted.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Branch v. Annucci

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 17, 2022
20-CV-07968 (ER)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Branch v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:WALTER BRANCH, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 17, 2022

Citations

20-CV-07968 (ER)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 17, 2022)