From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Coolidge 234, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 12, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-01707-MMD-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-01707-MMD-NJK

03-12-2013

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO., Plaintiff(s), v. COOLIDGE 234, LLC, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO

STAY DISCOVERY (Docket No. 21)

Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to stay discovery pending ruling on the motion to dismiss, Docket No. 21, which is DENIED without prejudice. The parties provide no support for their request other than the fact that a motion to dismiss is pending. The pendency of a motion to dismiss alone does not in itself stay discovery. See, e.g., Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 600 (D. Nev. 2011) ("The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of discovery when a potentially dispositive motion is pending."). Instead, parties seeking to stay discovery must make a showing that such a stay is proper under the standards announced in Tradebay, 278 F.R.D. at 601-03. As no such showing has been made here, the stipulation to stay discovery is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________

NANCY J. KOPPE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Coolidge 234, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 12, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-01707-MMD-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Coolidge 234, LLC

Case Details

Full title:BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO., Plaintiff(s), v. COOLIDGE 234, LLC, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-01707-MMD-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 12, 2013)