From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branam v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Feb 25, 2020
600 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107203

02-25-2020

Lawrence P. BRANAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT, Emily Danker-Feldman, Jessica Hathaway, 120 S. Central Ave., Ste. 130, St. Louis, MO 63105. FOR RESPONDENT, Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.


FOR APPELLANT, Emily Danker-Feldman, Jessica Hathaway, 120 S. Central Ave., Ste. 130, St. Louis, MO 63105.

FOR RESPONDENT, Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. Lawrence P. Branam appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Branam v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Feb 25, 2020
600 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Branam v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence P. BRANAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Feb 25, 2020

Citations

600 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)