Summary
applying 23 U.S.C. § 128, 49 U.S.C. § 1653(f) and 23 U.S.C. § 138
Summary of this case from Hill v. ColemanOpinion
No. 73-1360.
June 17, 1974.
C.A. 5tfi Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 485 F. 2d 1125.
applying 23 U.S.C. § 128, 49 U.S.C. § 1653(f) and 23 U.S.C. § 138
Summary of this case from Hill v. ColemanNo. 73-1360.
June 17, 1974.
C.A. 5tfi Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 485 F. 2d 1125.
applying 23 U.S.C. § 128, 49 U.S.C. § 1653(f) and 23 U.S.C. § 138
Summary of this case from Hill v. ColemanFull title:BRAMSON ET AL. v. BUTZ, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 17, 1974
Yet, the duty of due consideration created by these statutory sections is more clearly imposed upon the…
United States v. BlakeyThis evidence shows that some legitimate business activity affecting commerce took place in Dyer's shop. The…