From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brammer v. Ricks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 23, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93507

Decided and Entered: October 23, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered November 26, 2002 in Franklin County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition as time barred.

Joseph Brammer, Malone, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner attempted to commence this proceeding by means of an amended petition, seeking, inter alia, review of all prison disciplinary determinations that found him guilty of violating urinalysis testing procedures since November 1995, on the ground that he suffers from shy bladder syndrome. Supreme Court properly dismissed the amended petition as barred by the applicable four-month statute of limitations (see CPLR 217). As the papers were not timely filed, the judgment of dismissal is affirmed (see Matter of Grant v. Senkowski, 95 N.Y.2d 605, 610; Matter of Huber v. Selsky, 284 A.D.2d 676).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Brammer v. Ricks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 23, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Brammer v. Ricks

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH BRAMMER, Appellant, v. THOMAS RICKS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 23, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 128