From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Apr 13, 1943
9 N.W.2d 115 (Wis. 1943)

Opinion

March 9, 1943. —

April 13, 1943.

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: AUGUST E. BRAUN, Circuit Judge. Affirmed.

For the appellant there was a brief by Roy O. Conen and Nathaniel D. Rothstein, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Rothstein.

For the respondent there was a brief by Burns Mehigan of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Irving P. Mehigan.


Action by Herman Bramman against the Teutonia Recreation Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant entered May 22, 1942, the plaintiff appeals.


The action is to recover for personal injuries. There was a jury trial. At the close of the plaintiff's testimony the defendant moved for a nonsuit. The motion was granted and judgment was duly entered thereon. After the appeal was perfected the plaintiff moved for an extension of time in which to serve a bill of exceptions. The court entered an order extending that time. From that order the defendant duly appealed. That appeal was heard and the order reversed. See opinion in Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co., ante, p. 620, 9 N.W.2d 113. The reversal of that order nullifies the bill of exceptions settled pursuant thereto. The only question presented on appeal from a judgment of nonsuit is whether the evidence presents a jury question. The evidence not being properly before us we cannot say that it does and the judgment must be affirmed.

By the Court. — The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Apr 13, 1943
9 N.W.2d 115 (Wis. 1943)
Case details for

Bramman v. Teutonia Recreation Co.

Case Details

Full title:BRAMMAN, Appellant, vs. TEUTONIA RECREATION COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Apr 13, 1943

Citations

9 N.W.2d 115 (Wis. 1943)
9 N.W.2d 115

Citing Cases

Padilla v. Bydalek

Household Utilities, Inc. v. Andrews Co. (1976), 71 Wis.2d 17, 24, 236 N.W.2d 663. See also: Bramman v.…