From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bramhall v. Winder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Jan 22, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-607 TS (D. Utah Jan. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-607 TS

01-22-2013

EARL E. BRAMHALL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES WINDER et al., Defendants.


DISMISSAL ORDER

& MEMORANDUM DECISION


District Judge Ted Stewart

Plaintiff, inmate Earl E. Bramhall, filed this pro se civil rights suit, see 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 (2012), proceeding in forma pauperis, see 28 id. 1915. Reviewing the Complaint under § 1915(e), in an Order dated October 29, 2012, the Court determined Plaintiff's Complaint was deficient. The Court then gave Plaintiff direction for curing the deficiencies, sent him a "Pro Se Litigant Guide," with a blank-form civil rights complaint, and ordered him to cure the deficiencies within thirty days. Plaintiff has not responded. Indeed, the Court has not heard from Plaintiff since he filed several documents on September 12, 2012.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), failure to follow Court orders, and failure to prosecute. This case is CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

JUDGE CLARK WADDOUPS

United States District Court


Summaries of

Bramhall v. Winder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Jan 22, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-607 TS (D. Utah Jan. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Bramhall v. Winder

Case Details

Full title:EARL E. BRAMHALL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES WINDER et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-607 TS (D. Utah Jan. 22, 2013)