From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brambila-Guzman v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 13, 2007
234 F. App'x 784 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 05-74704, 06-70888, 06-71594.

Submitted July 12, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed July 13, 2007.

Manuel F. Rios, III, Esq., Rios Cantor, PS, Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, William C. Minick, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency Nos. A29-672-437, A29-672-442, A72-531-045.

Before: HUG, McKEOWN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.



ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Respondent's Unopposed Motion to Remand the consolidated cases to the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") is GRANTED.

The BIA shall reconsider its January 24, 2006 decision in light of Lin v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2007). The Board shall remand to the immigration judge ("IJ") for the IJ to determine the effect, if any, of the BIA's reconsideration of its January 24, 2006 decision on the IJ's February 3, 2005 decision relating to the three Petitioners.

A certified copy of this order sent to the BIA shall constitute the mandate of this court.


Summaries of

Brambila-Guzman v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 13, 2007
234 F. App'x 784 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Brambila-Guzman v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:Oscar BRAMBILA-GUZMAN; Ernestina Brambila-Guzman de Brambila, Petitioners…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 13, 2007

Citations

234 F. App'x 784 (9th Cir. 2007)