From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 15, 1986
496 So. 2d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2874.

October 15, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Manuel Menendez, Jr., J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. We affirm the conviction because we find no reversible error to have been committed, but reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.

The trial court departed from the recommended range of the sentencing guidelines and gave as grounds for that departure that defendant was an illegal alien and that the amount of cocaine possessed by defendant was "suggestive of dealing rather than mere possession." Both of these grounds violate Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11) because they punish defendant for offenses for which he was not convicted.

The conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is reversed and remanded for sentencing within the guidelines range.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 15, 1986
496 So. 2d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Bram v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALEX BRAM, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 15, 1986

Citations

496 So. 2d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Rozar v. State

This ground violates Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) because it punishes the defendant for…

Cortez-Gonzalez v. State

This is improper. Bram v. State, 496 So.2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). The court also cited the quantity of…