From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bragg v. Hi-Rise, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2022
No. 20-CV-8131 (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-8131

05-24-2022

KYLE BRAGG, AS TRUSTEE, AND THE TRUSTEES OF THE BUILDING SERVICE 32BJ HEALTH FUND AND MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, BUILDING SERVICE 32BJ HEALTH FUND, MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. HI-RISE, INC., HI-RISE BUILDING SERVICES, INC., LIMITLESS WINDOW CLEANING CORP., ROBERT MORONEY, Defendants.


DEFAULT JUDGMENT

PAUL A. CROTTY, U.S.D.J.

On application for Default Judgment by Plaintiffs Kyle Bragg, as Trustee, and the Trustees of the Building Service 32BJ Health Fund and Massachusetts Service Employees Pension Fund, brought on by Notice of Motion dated April 22, 2022 and returnable before the Honorable Paul A. Crotty, United States District Judge, and Defendants Hi-Rise, Inc., Hi-Rise Building Services, Inc., Limitless Window Cleaning Corp., and Robert Moroney (“Defendants”) having been duly noticed of the proceeding and having not appeared in opposition to the Motion, and the Court having found default judgment to be appropriate:

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Kyle Bragg, as Trustee, and the Trustees of the Building Service 32BJ Health Fund and Massachusetts Service Employees Pension Fund, Building Service 32BJ Health Fund, and Massachusetts Service Employees Pension Fund, having their principal place of business at 25 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, do recover of Defendants Hi-Rise, Inc., located at 1222 Bennington St., East Boston, MA 02128, Hi-Rise Building Services, Inc., located at 1222 Bennington St., East Boston, MA 02128, Limitless Window Cleaning Corp., located at 55 Lewis St., Apt, 511, East Boston, MA 02128, and Robert Moroney, located at 1222 Bennington St., East Boston, MA 02128 jointly and severally:

(1) for the time period January 1, 2017 through the date of this Judgment, true, correct and complete copies of Hi-Rise, Inc., Hi-Rise Building Services, Inc., and Limitless Window Cleaning Corp.'s, individual earnings records (payroll history records); weekly payroll journals; timesheets; quarterly federal and state payroll tax returns; W-2s; an employee roster (listing job description, hire, leave and termination date); and, general ledger/cash disbursements journal, plus whatever additional documents are necessary or desirable to conduct the payroll compliance audit, and once the audit documents are provided, prompt payment of the audit findings principal, interest, and liquidated damages; (2) principal in the amount of $2,973.00, interest of $1,119.09, liquidated damages of $577.00, audit costs of $3,238.25, attorney's fees of $3,150.00 and costs of $402.00, for a grand total of $11,459.34, and that Plaintiffs have judgment therefor.

Plaintiffs' requested $991.09 in liquidated damages is not sufficiently supported by the record; instead, it is calculated based on the “estimated” (see Bloom Aff., ¶ 1, ECF No. 63.) and otherwise unsubstantiated principal sought in the Second Amended Complaint (see Compl. ¶ 15, ECF No. 28). The Court thus instead awards liquidated damages in the amount supported by Plaintiffs' documentary submissions. (See Ex. M at ¶ 8, ECF No. 63-13.)


Summaries of

Bragg v. Hi-Rise, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2022
No. 20-CV-8131 (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Bragg v. Hi-Rise, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KYLE BRAGG, AS TRUSTEE, AND THE TRUSTEES OF THE BUILDING SERVICE 32BJ…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 24, 2022

Citations

No. 20-CV-8131 (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)