From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bragg v. Fidelis Facility Serv. Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
21-cv-8291 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-8291 (VSB)

05-20-2022

KYLE BRAGG, AS TRUSTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FIDELIS FACILITY SERVICE GROUP, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge

Today, I held a status conference in this case. In accordance with my comments at the conference, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' request to withdraw their Motion for Default Judgment and file a Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED. (Doc. 29.) Plaintiffs are directed to file a Second Amended Complaint on or before June 20, 2022. Plaintiffs are further directed to serve the Second Amended Complaint on Defendant via email or any other previously effective means of service and file an affidavit of such service on or before June 24, 2022.

As previously noted, because Defendant Fidelis Facility Service Group, Inc. is a corporation, Defendant may not proceed in federal court without licensed counsel. See, e.g., Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993). I remind Defendant that if Defendant intends to appear in this action, Defendant will need to retain counsel.

Plaintiffs are directed to serve this order on Defendant via email or any other previously effective means of service and file an affidavit of such service on or before May 27, 2022.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bragg v. Fidelis Facility Serv. Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
21-cv-8291 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Bragg v. Fidelis Facility Serv. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:KYLE BRAGG, AS TRUSTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FIDELIS FACILITY SERVICE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 20, 2022

Citations

21-cv-8291 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)